Philo v. Rought
123 A.2d 168, 385 Pa. 275, 1956 Pa. LEXIS 465
Opinion
Philo, Appellant,
v.
Rought.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Before STERN, C.J., JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.
*276 Joseph Mieszkowski, for appellant.
H. Monroe Houtz, with him R. Lawrence Coughlin, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, May 21, 1956:
The order entered in the Court below is affirmed on the Opinion by Judge PINOLA.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Philo v. Rought, 123 A.2d 168, 385 Pa. 275, 1956 Pa. LEXIS 465 (Pa. 1956).
123 A.2d 168 (Philo v. Rought) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Interest of Roy
620 A.2d 1172 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Lock Estate
244 A.2d 677 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Potoczny v. Dydek
162 A.2d 70 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)