Philmore v. Florida

Supreme Court

Philmore v. Florida

139 S. Ct. 478, 202 L. Ed. 2d 388

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 13, 2018

DocketNo. 17–9556.

StatusPublished

This text of 139 S. Ct. 478 (Philmore v. Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Philmore v. Florida, 139 S. Ct. 478, 202 L. Ed. 2d 388 (U.S. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied. Justice THOMAS, concurring in the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in Reynolds v. Florida, 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, ---L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in Reynolds v. Florida, 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied. Justice THOMAS, concurring in the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in Reynolds v. Florida, 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, ---L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in Reynolds v. Florida, 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 S. Ct. 478, 202 L. Ed. 2d 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philmore-v-florida-scotus-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack