Phillips v. Trull

11 Johns. 486
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1814·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Pbatt, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. All persons whatever, who are present when a felony is committed, or a, dangerous wound is given, are bound to apprehend the offenders. (3 Hawk. P. C. 157. Arrest, s. 1.) So any person whatever, if an affray be made, to the breach of the peace, may3 without a warrant from a magistrate, restrain any of the offender s, in order to preserve the peace, but after there is an end of the affray, they cannot be arrested without a warrant. (2 Inst. 52. Burns’ Justice, 92.)

Hawkins (3 Hawk. P. C. 174. b. 2. s. 20.) says, "It seems clear, that, regularly, no private person can, of his own authority, arrest another for a bare breach of the peace, after it is over.

We are of opinion, that thfe special plea of justification i,. Toad; and the plaintiff Is, therefore, entitled to judgment on the dc-miKTer.

.Tadgment for the plaintiff!

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. Trull, 11 Johns. 486 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

11 Johns. 486 (Phillips v. Trull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McAteer
511 S.E.2d 79 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1998)
Palmer v. Maine Central Railroad
42 A. 800 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1899)
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Cain
28 L.R.A. 688 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1895)
State v. Lewis
50 Ohio St. (N.S.) 179 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1893)
Winn v. Hobson
22 Jones & S. 330 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1887)
Crumeill v. Hill
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 236 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1886)
Wahl v. Walton
16 N.W. 397 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1883)
People v. Adler
3 Park. Cr. 249 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
People v. Bush
1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 137 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1823)