Phillips v. State

106 S.W.2d 299, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 680

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 Tex. Crim. 574 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 9, 1937·No. No. 19087·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The enhanced penalty for the third conviction, as provided in article 63, P.C., was-invoked.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular and properly presented.' No error has been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The enhanced penalty for the third conviction, as provided in article 63, P.C., was-invoked.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular and properly presented.' No error has been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Phillips v. State, 106 S.W.2d 299, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 680 (Tex. 1937).

Pincite

106 S.W.2d 299 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.