Phillips v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Phillips v. State

106 S.W.2d 299, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 680

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 9, 1937

DocketNo. 19087

StatusPublished

This text of 106 S.W.2d 299 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. State, 106 S.W.2d 299, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 680 (Tex. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The enhanced penalty for the third conviction, as provided in article 63, P.C., was-invoked.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular and properly presented.' No error has been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The enhanced penalty for the third conviction, as provided in article 63, P.C., was-invoked.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular and properly presented.' No error has been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 S.W.2d 299, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.