Phillips v. State
This text of 180 S.E. 249 (Phillips v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor (possessing whisky), and the jury were authorized to find from the conflicting evidence that at the time charged in the accusation he was near the scene of the offense and actively aiding and abetting another in the commission of the crime charged. It follows that his conviction was supported by the evidence. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of alleged errors of commission and omission in the charge of the court, show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 S.E. 249, 51 Ga. App. 327, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-state-gactapp-1935.