Phillips v. State
963 So. 2d 283, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11819, 2007 WL 2189128
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 942 So. 2d 1042 →
Opinion
Appellant filed, without reference to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), a motion simply titled “Motion to Define or Clarify.” The trial court treated the motion as a rule 3.800(c) motion and denied it on the merits. We dismiss the [284]*284appeal as a non-appealable order. See State v. Woodard, 866 So.2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Grosse v. State, 511 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillips v. State, 963 So. 2d 283, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11819, 2007 WL 2189128 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
963 So. 2d 283 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Woodard
866 So. 2d 120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Grosse v. State
511 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)