Phillips v. State

914 So. 2d 22, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15297, 2005 WL 2373920
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 877 So. 2d 912
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2005·No. No. 4D05-3259·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. With respect to the use of rule 3.800(a) as an avenue of relief, see Williams v. State, 825 So.2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA), cause dismissed, 891 So.2d 554 (Fla.2002); on the merits of the claim, see State v. Woodley, 695 So.2d 297 (Fla.) (holding that Gray was not to be applied retroactively to cases which were final at the time Gray was rendered), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 893, 118 S.Ct. 234, 139 L.Ed.2d 165 (1997); State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552, 554 (Fla.1995) (“This decision must be applied to all cases pending on direct review or not yet final.”) (emphasis added).

STEVENSON, C.J., GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. State, 914 So. 2d 22, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 15297, 2005 WL 2373920 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

914 So. 2d 22 (Phillips v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Woodley
695 So. 2d 297 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Williams v. State
825 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Gray
654 So. 2d 552 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Swindle v. Love
522 U.S. 893 (Supreme Court, 1997)