Phillips v. Hyde

Supreme Court

Phillips v. Hyde

1 U.S. 439, 1 Dall. 439

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 1, 1789

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 1 U.S. 439 (Phillips v. Hyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. Hyde, 1 U.S. 439, 1 Dall. 439 (1789).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

overruled the evidence, (a)

A question then arose, whether the jury could include the costs which had accrued on the replevin, in their verdict in the present action. And the Court were clearly of opinion, that they could, and ought to do so. (b)

Conformable to which was the verdict of the jury.

(a)

See Shewoll v. Fell; 3 Yeates 17; 4 Id. 47.

(b)

Sergeant having suggested, that both the points in this case had been otherwise determined in a case of Jackson v. Webb, Mr. President Shippen said, that the matter was there left, upon equitable circumstances, to the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

overruled the evidence, (a)

A question then arose, whether the jury could include the costs which had accrued on the replevin, in their verdict in the present action. And the Court were clearly of opinion, that they could, and ought to do so. (b)

Conformable to which was the verdict of the jury.

(a)

See Shewoll v. Fell; 3 Yeates 17; 4 Id. 47.

(b)

Sergeant having suggested, that both the points in this case had been otherwise determined in a case of Jackson v. Webb, Mr. President Shippen said, that the matter was there left, upon equitable circumstances, to the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 U.S. 439, 1 Dall. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-hyde-scotus-1789.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack