Phillips v. Hyde
1 U.S. 439, 1 Dall. 439
Opinion
overruled the evidence, (a)
A question then arose, whether the jury could include the costs which had accrued on the replevin, in their verdict in the present action. And the Court were clearly of opinion, that they could, and ought to do so. (b)
Conformable to which was the verdict of the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillips v. Hyde, 1 U.S. 439, 1 Dall. 439 (1789).
1 U.S. 439 (Phillips v. Hyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whiting v. . Barney
30 N.Y. 330 (New York Court of Appeals, 1864)
Balsley v. Hoffman
13 Pa. 603 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1850)
Caldwell v. West
21 N.J.L. 411 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1848)
Tibbal v. Cahoon
10 Watts 232 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1840)
Knowles v. Lord
4 Whart. 500 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1839)
Woodsides v. State
3 Miss. 655 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1837)
Brown v. Payson
6 N.H. 443 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1833)
Blythe v. Richards
10 Serg. & Rawle 261 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1823)