Phillips v. Hust

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phillips v. Hust. Read the opinion of the Court — 588 F.3d 652
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2009·No. 07-36082·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 02 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANK MARVIN PHILLIPS, No. 07-36082

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-01-01252-HA

v. MEMORANDUM * LYNN HUST,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding

Before: D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.**

In light of our concurrently filed opinion in Phillips v. Hust, No. 04-36021,

this appeal is DISMISSED as moot.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. Hust, (9th Cir. 2009).

Phillips v. Hust (Phillips v. Hust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.