Phillips v. Hust
This text of Phillips v. Hust (Phillips v. Hust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 02 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANK MARVIN PHILLIPS, No. 07-36082
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-01-01252-HA
v. MEMORANDUM * LYNN HUST,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding
Before: D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.**
In light of our concurrently filed opinion in Phillips v. Hust, No. 04-36021,
this appeal is DISMISSED as moot.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Phillips v. Hust, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-hust-ca9-2009.