Phillips v. Hunt

213 N.W. 514, 115 Neb. 395, 1927 Neb. LEXIS 50
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedApril 12, 1927
DocketNo. 24781
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 213 N.W. 514 (Phillips v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Hunt, 213 N.W. 514, 115 Neb. 395, 1927 Neb. LEXIS 50 (Neb. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This suit is an ordinary proceeding in equity instituted by appellee, Phillips, herein called plaintiff, to foreclose a mortgage on certain real estate in Madison county. Appellant, Hunt, hereinafter called defendant, interposed an answer challenging the power of the state to enact a statute fixing interest rates chargeable on loans of money, owing to the provisions of section 8, art. I of the federal Constitution, as follows: “The congress shall have power * * * to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures.” To this answer the plaintiff interposed a general demurrer, which was sustained. The facts pleaded in the answer are those set forth in the case of Klattenburg v. Qualsett, 114 Neb. 18, in which the question here presented was considered by us and decided adversely to the contention of defendant. While the answer in this instant case amplifies somewhat the facts alleged in the answer in the previous case, a careful consideration leads us to conclude that the law as announced in the Klattenburg case is controlling.

[396]*396Our attention has also been called to the preamble of the federal Constitution, sometimes designated as the general welfare clause. This, we have considered in connection with our previous holding, but incline to the opinion that it in no manner modifies or limits the provisions of such section 8, art. I, under consideration.

It follows that error was not committed by the trial court in sustaining the demurrer, and in entering judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Affirmed. ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ash v. City of Omaha Ex Rel. Pentzien
42 N.W.2d 648 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1950)
Kohlman v. Hyland
219 N.W. 228 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 N.W. 514, 115 Neb. 395, 1927 Neb. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-hunt-neb-1927.