Phillips v. Bliss

32 Mo. 427
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJuly 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 32 Mo. 427 (Phillips v. Bliss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Bliss, 32 Mo. 427 (Mo. 1862).

Opinion

Bay, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit by attachment, brought before a justice of the peace. Judgment being rendered for the plaintiff, the defendant took his appeal to the Circuit Court, where the defendant filed a plea in the nature of a plea in abatement, putting in issue the truth of the affidavit upon which the attachment was predicated. Plaintiff moved to strike out the plea upon the ground that the defendant, by pleading to the merits in the justice’s court, had waived his right to plead in abatement; but the court overruled the motion, and this is the only ground of error assigned in this court. If the suit had been instituted in the Circuit Court, and the defendant in his answer had plead both in abatement and in bar to the merits of the action, the plea in bar would undoubtedly have been a waiver of his right to plead in abatement; but, with reference to appeals from justices of the peace, our statute requires that the appellate court shall proceed to hear, try, and determine the same anew. It is true that the cause of action cannot be changed, but the defendant is by no means limited or confined to the same defence set up before the justice. It is a trial de novo, and his pleading to the merits before the justice did not waive his right to plead in abatement in the Circuit Court.

Let the judgment be affirmed;

the other judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comfort v. Lynam
67 Mo. App. 668 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)
Coombs Commission Co. v. Block
32 S.W. 1139 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)
Meyers v. Boyd
37 Mo. App. 532 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
Hubbard v. Quisenberry
28 Mo. App. 20 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Compton v. Parsons
76 Mo. 455 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1882)
Moore v. Hutchinson
69 Mo. 429 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Mo. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-bliss-mo-1862.