Compton v. Parsons

76 Mo. 455
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 76 Mo. 455 (Compton v. Parsons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Compton v. Parsons, 76 Mo. 455 (Mo. 1882).

Opinion

I.

Sherwood, J.

When a cause comes by appeal from a justice of the peace to the circuit court, it is to be tried de novo. R. S-. 1879, § 3052. And the defendant may avail himself of any defense he may have, whether offered in [457]*457the magistrate’s court or not. Hall v. Mills, 11 Mo. 217; Phillips v. Bliss, 32 Mo. 427. The only exception to this is, when the defendant is personally served with process he ■cannot plead in the circuit court a set-off he had not pleaded before the justice of the peace. R. S. 1879, §. 3059; Webb v. Tweedie, 30 Mo. 488. Of consequence, there was error in refusing defendant permission to show in the circuit court, and for the first time, that plaintiff was not •the real party in interest, or had not the legal capacity to sue.

II.

If the “ water drawer ” was worthless for the purpose for which it was purchased, this was a valid defense as showing an entire failure of consideration, and this, whether defendant returned or offered to return the machine or not, or failed to notify plaintiff of its worthlessness. Murphy v. Gay, 37 Mo. 535, and cases cited. Result: Judgment .reversed and cause remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Krause v. Spurgeon
297 S.W. 434 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1927)
Hill v. Dillon
161 S.W. 881 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
Barr v. Lake
126 S.W. 755 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Buss v. Allison Window Glass Co.
123 S.W. 949 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1909)
Jasper County Bank v. Barts
109 S.W. 1057 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Bailey v. Gilman Bank
74 S.W. 874 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
Simon v. Ryan
73 S.W. 353 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
D. June & Co. v. J. V. Falkinburg
89 Mo. App. 563 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Henry
70 Mo. App. 19 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1897)
Comfort v. Lynam
67 Mo. App. 668 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)
McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Brower
62 N.W. 700 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1895)
Johnson v. Sproull
50 Mo. App. 121 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Boyer v. Neel
50 Mo. App. 26 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Werner v. O'Brien
40 Mo. App. 483 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
Meyers v. Boyd
37 Mo. App. 532 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
Brown v. Weldon
99 Mo. 564 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1889)
Brown v. Weldon
27 Mo. App. 251 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Kerr v. Haymaker
20 Mo. App. 350 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Mo. 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compton-v-parsons-mo-1882.