Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Phillipe v. State

Phillipe v. State

107 So. 3d 491, 2013 WL 512891, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2249
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 2013
DocketNo. 4D12-2760
StatusPublished

This text of 107 So. 3d 491 (Phillipe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillipe v. State, 107 So. 3d 491, 2013 WL 512891, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2249 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The motion for postconviction relief was untimely. In addition, it is [492]*492without merit. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maestas v. State
76 So. 3d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
96 So. 3d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 So. 3d 491, 2013 WL 512891, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillipe-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.