Philipp Bros. Ore v. United States
49 Cust. Ct. 194, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1153
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Philipp Bros. Ore v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 Cust. Ct. 64 →
United States Customs Court·Decided August 1, 1962·No. No. 66944; protest 61/685 (A) (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Firth Sterling, Inc. v. United States (48 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 779), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Philipp Bros. Ore v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 194, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1153 (cusc 1962).
49 Cust. Ct. 194 (Philipp Bros. Ore v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Firth Sterling, Inc. v. United States
48 C.C.P.A. 130 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1961)