Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Byron
This text of 876 N.E.2d 645 (Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Byron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
This cause coming to be heard on the motion of the petitioner, Philip Morris USA, Inc, an objection having been filed by the respondents Sharon Price, et al, a reply having been filed by the petitioner, and the court being fully advised in the premises;
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition is denied. The motion for supervisory order is allowed. In the exercise of this court’s supervisory authority, the circuit court of Madison County is directed to vacate its order of May 9, 2007, certifying questions for interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 in Price et al. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., No. 00 L 112, and to enter an order dismissing plaintiffs’ motion to vacate or withhold final judgment pursuant to section 2 — 1203 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 1203 (West 2006)).
Order entered by the Court.
CHIEF JUSTICE THOMAS took no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
876 N.E.2d 645, 226 Ill. 2d 416, 315 Ill. Dec. 333, 2007 Ill. LEXIS 1154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philip-morris-usa-inc-v-byron-ill-2007.