Philip K. Paulson v. City of San Diego Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, Inc.

281 F.3d 812, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1537, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1245, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1831, 2002 WL 215634

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Philip K. Paulson v. City of San Diego Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 294 F.3d 1124 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 7, 2002·No. 00-55406·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philip K. Paulson v. City of San Diego Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, Inc., 281 F.3d 812, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1537, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1245, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1831, 2002 WL 215634 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

281 F.3d 812 (Philip K. Paulson v. City of San Diego Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

United States of America, and State of California, Ex Rel. California Department of Health Services Hazardous Substance Account and Hazardous Cleanup Fund v. Shell Oil Company Union Oil Company of California Atlantic Richfield Company Texaco, Inc. Los Coyotes Estates Ramparts Research & Financial Corporation, United States of America State of California, Ex Rel. California Department of Health Services Hazardous Substance Account and Hazardous Cleanup Fund v. Shell Oil Company Union Oil Company of California Atlantic Richfield Company Texaco, Inc., and Los Coyotes Estates Ramparts Research & Financial Corporation

281 F.3d 812 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Opinion

Related