Philip Garay v. State

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 30, 2015

No. 04-14-00252-CR

Philip GARAY,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR2843 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On January 26, 2015, appellant Philip Garay filed a pro se motion to dismiss, seeking to dismiss this appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Appellant also filed a pro se motion for leave to file a pro se supplemental brief. Counsel has been appointed to represent appellant in this criminal appeal, and counsel has submitted a brief on appellant’s behalf. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Therefore, appellant’s pro se motions are DENIED. We will only consider the brief filed by appellant’s counsel.

It is so ORDERED on the 30th day of January, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court