Philip Carey Co. v. Pingree

223 Mass. 352
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 4, 1916·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Carroll, J.

This is an action for work and material. The defendants are trustees of the Melrose Real Estate Trust. They contend that they are not liable, because the work and material were furnished to the trust and the contract was signed by them not, as individuals, but as trustees. At the trial, against the exception of the plaintiff, the defendants introduced evidence of an oral agreement, made before the written contract was signed, by which the plaintiff agreed not to look to the defendants for payment.

The jury found in answer to a question, that there was no such oral agreement, and also found for the plaintiff. The case is here [353] on a report made by the judge

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Philip Carey Co. v. Pingree, 223 Mass. 352 (Mass. 1916).

223 Mass. 352 (Philip Carey Co. v. Pingree) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heuler Tile Co. v. Speros
1983 Mass. App. Div. 194 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1983)
Hynes v. Commissioner
74 T.C. No. 93 (U.S. Tax Court, 1980)
Dolben v. Gleason
198 N.E. 762 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Baetjer v. Registrar of Property of Guayama
48 P.R. 627 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1935)
Baetjer v. Registrador de la Propiedad de Guayama
48 P.R. Dec. 647 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1935)
Hawthorne v. Austin Organ Co.
71 F.2d 945 (Fourth Circuit, 1934)
Larson v. Sylvester
185 N.E. 44 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
B. B. Noyes Co. v. Ballard
148 N.E. 807 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)