Philadelphia v. Hey

20 Pa. Super. 480, 1902 Pa. Super. LEXIS 265
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 10, 1902
DocketAppeal, No. 186
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 20 Pa. Super. 480 (Philadelphia v. Hey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Philadelphia v. Hey, 20 Pa. Super. 480, 1902 Pa. Super. LEXIS 265 (Pa. Ct. App. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are of the opinion that the questions raised on the argument of this appeal, as well as the appeal of City of Philadelphia v. Hannah Athow et al., No. 187, October term, 1901, were correctly decided by the court below. The cases are controlled by the Act of July 26, 1897, P. L. 420, and not by the Act of April 16, 1845, P. L. 488, which alone was construed in the case of Philadelphia v. Beatty, 9 Pa. Superior Ct. 255. The judgments are sustained by the clear and satisfactory opinions of the court below in which we concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Millcreek Township v. Young
22 Pa. D. & C.3d 435 (Erie County Court Common Pleas, 1981)
City of Allentown v. Ott
85 Pa. Super. 210 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Philadelphia v. Sciple
31 Pa. Super. 64 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Tarentum Borough v. Moorhead
26 Pa. Super. 273 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Pa. Super. 480, 1902 Pa. Super. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/philadelphia-v-hey-pasuperct-1902.