Phelps v. Phelps
7 Paige Ch. 150, 1838 N.Y. LEXIS 318, 1838 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 80
Opinion
decided that the service of the subpoena was regular; and that as it was not pretended by the defendant that he had a legal and meritorious defence to the suit of which he had been deprived in consequence of his situation, the vice chancellor was right in refusing to open the default and to vacate the decree.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phelps v. Phelps, 7 Paige Ch. 150, 1838 N.Y. LEXIS 318, 1838 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 80 (N.Y. 1838).
7 Paige Ch. 150 (Phelps v. Phelps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Tramner
35 Nev. 56 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1912)
Gray v. Gray
79 S.W. 505 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
White v. . Underwood
46 L.R.A. 706 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
People v. Flynn
7 Utah 378 (Utah Supreme Court, 1891)
Bonnell v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburgh Railroad
19 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 218 (New York Supreme Court, 1877)
Baker v. Wales
14 Abb. Pr. 331 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1873)
Davis v. Duffie
1 Abb. Ct. App. 486 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
Davis v. Duffie
8 Bosw. 617 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1861)