Baker v. Wales

The Superior Court of New York City

Baker v. Wales

3 Jones & S. 403

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided April 5, 1873·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

The court below found, upon evidence somewhat conflicting, that deceit had been used for the purpose of bringing defendant within the jurisdiction of this court. We have carefully-examined the evidence and deem it amply sufficient to sustain such finding. The service of the summons was therefore properly vacated and set aside (Carpenter v. Spooner, 2 Sands, 716).

The order must be affirmed, with costs.

Monell and Curtis, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

The court below found, upon evidence somewhat conflicting, that deceit had been used for the purpose of bringing defendant within the jurisdiction of this court. We have carefully-examined the evidence and deem it amply sufficient to sustain such finding. The service of the summons was therefore properly vacated and set aside (Carpenter v. Spooner, 2 Sands, 716).

The order must be affirmed, with costs.

Monell and Curtis, JJ., concurred.

Baker v. Wales, 3 Jones & S. 403 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

Pincite

3 Jones & S. 403 (Baker v. Wales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related