Phelps v. Belle Isle
116 S.E. 217, 29 Ga. App. 571, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 121
Opinion
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Applying to the facts above stated the principles of law stated in the headnotes, there was no error in “overruling” or dismissing the certiorari; and the form of the judgment was sufficient to imply such action.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phelps v. Belle Isle, 116 S.E. 217, 29 Ga. App. 571, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 121 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
116 S.E. 217 (Phelps v. Belle Isle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of America v. Georgia State Bank
209 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Houston v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance
168 S.E.2d 843 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Franco v. Bank of Forest Park
165 S.E.2d 593 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Jones v. Commercial Credit Co.
184 S.E. 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Crine v. Morton Salt Co.
174 S.E. 723 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Cody & Edgar v. Automobile Financing Inc.
140 S.E. 634 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Burch v. Atlantic Life Insurance
139 S.E. 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Pierce v. Jones
137 S.E. 296 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Flood v. Empire Investment Co.
133 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Guthrie v. Rowan
131 S.E. 93 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Collins v. Savannah Guano Co.
127 S.E. 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)