Phadnis v. Tata America International Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 22, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-08542·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PANKAJ KUMUDCHANDRA PHADNIS, Plaintiff, -against- 21-CV-8542 (LTS) TATA AMERICA INTERNATIONAL ORDER CORPORATION; US DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. On November 5, 2021, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff stating that he had previously submitted an “instrument drawn on J P Morgan Chase Bank NA, New York,” in the amount of $400.00 for payment of the fees to bring this action, but that the payment was delivered to the wrong address. (ECF 5, at 1.) Plaintiff further stated that he realized that the fees required to bring a civil action in this court are $402.00, not $400.00, and asked the Court for an extension of time to pay the remaining $2.00. By order dated November 8, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for an extension. On November 9, 2021, the Court received from Plaintiff a check in the amount of $400.00. Plaintiff’s check was rejected, however, because it was not certified by a United States bank. (Dkt. Entry of November 9, 2021). On November 10, 2021, Plaintiff filed a letter stating that the bank issuing the check had clarified that it was a “certified check” and that it was “issued on the stationary of the Issuing Bank and its Correspondent Bank in New York under their inter banking agreement.” (ECF 7, at 1.) Plaintiff requests that the court accept his previous check and that he be permitted to submit payment for the $2.00 balance using a similar instrument. Because this court does not accept checks drawn on foreign banks, as the court is unable to deposit the funds in a normal manner, the Court directs Plaintiff to submit the $402.00 in filing fees. If Plaintiff wishes to pay by check, he must submit a check certified by a United States- based bank. In light of Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court grants him an additional thirty days

from the date of tis order to submit payment. The Court also directs the Clerk of Court to destroy the check for $400.00 that Plaintiff previously submitted. CONCLUSION The Court directs Plaintiff to submit the $402.00 in fees required to bring an action in this Court by check certified by a United States-based bank. Plaintiff must submit payment within thirty days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to destroy the check for $400.00 that Plaintiff previously submitted. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant

demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit this order to Plaintiff. Plaintiff has consented to receive electronic service of documents and notices in this action. (ECF 2.) SO ORDERED. Dated: November 22, 2021 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phadnis v. Tata America International Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Phadnis v. Tata America International Corporation (Phadnis v. Tata America International Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)