Ph. Schneider Brewing Co. v. Century Distilling Co.

107 F.2d 699, 43 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 262, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2809
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 1939
Docket1901
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 107 F.2d 699 (Ph. Schneider Brewing Co. v. Century Distilling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ph. Schneider Brewing Co. v. Century Distilling Co., 107 F.2d 699, 43 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 262, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2809 (10th Cir. 1939).

Opinion

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Philip Freiler was engaged in the wholesale liquor business at Elgin, Illinois, from 1883 to 1914. During that period he purchased whiskey from distillers and sold it at wholesale under the trade-mark “Century Club.” On March 19, 1907, Freiler registered the mark “Century Club” for distilled alcoholic liquors on an application filed April 20, 1905. Elgin became dry *701 territory under local option in 1914 and Freiler discontinued his wholesale liquor business. He sold all his merchandise, labels, and advertising matter to Henry A. Klein, of Chicago, for a valuable consideration. It does not appear that any written assignment of the registered mark was made to Klein. Klein continued the business at Chicago under the name of the Freiler Company from 1914 to the advent of national prohibition in 1919. He employed salesmen who had worked for Freiler, advised the trade by letter that he had taken over the Freiler business, and used the mark “Century Club” on whiskey sold under the trade name Freiler Company. He also sold other brands under other trade names. Freiler’s registration expired in 1927 and was not renewed. After the adoption of the Twenty-First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, U.S.C.A., Klein again engaged in the wholesale liquor business through the Liquor Dealers Supply Company, 1 an Illinois corporation, the stock of which was owned by Klein, his wife, and his son, and continued to use the mark “Century Club.” Twenty-five separate invoices of the Supply Company covering the sales of Century Club whiskey to its customers in May, 1934, were introduced in evidence. The Supply Company purchased the whiskey which it sold under that mark from the Century Distilling Company. 2 No formal assignment of the mark “Century Club” was made by Klein to the Supply Company, but he impliedly consented to its use by the Supply Company. On July 10, 1934, the Supply Company registered the trade-mark “Century Club” for whiskey and gin on an application filed April 3, 1934. In its statement the Supply Company claimed use of the trade-mark by it and its predecessors from May 1, 1883.

Century Company was organized under the laws of Illinois on November 1, 1933. It built a modern distillery at Peoria, Illinois, completing it in January, 1934, and engaged in the distillation of whiskey, gin, and other alcoholic liquors.

On July 25, 1934, the Supply Company, by written assignment, transferred to the Century Company its registered mark “Century Club” and the good will associated with that mark.

Ph. Schneider Brewing Company, 3 a Colorado corporation, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of beer at Trinidad, Colorado. In 1908 it adopted the word “Century” as a trade-mark for beer and used it continuously from that date until 1916, when the state of Colorado became dry territory. From 1916 until 1933 the Schneider Company used the mark “Century” on nonalcoholic cereal malt beverages containing less than one-half of one per cent of alcohol by volume, commonly called “near beer.” On August 9, 1932, the Schneider Company registered the mark “Century” for nonalcoholic cereal malt beverages containing less than one-half of one per cent.of alcohol by volume on an application filed July 11, 1928. Since 1933 the Schneider Company has continuously used the name “Century” as a trade-mark for beer..

Since 1934 the Century Company has carried on a nation-wide business in whiskey, gin, and other distilled alcoholic beverages identified by the mark “Century.” Its products are well known and highly esteemed by the trade and public in general. Its sales have aggregated in excess of $3,000,000. It expends $150,000 annually in advertising its brands “Century” and “Century Club,” and those brands are well known throughout the United States.

Since 1908 the Schneider Company has expended the sum of approximately $30,000 annually in advertising “Century” beer and “Century” near beer.

On April 13, 1936, the Century Company applied to the United States Patent Office for registration of the trade-mark “Century” for gin. The Patent Office placed the application in interference with the registration of the Schneider Company of the mark “Century” for nonalcoholic cereal malt beverages. On May 17, 1938, the Examiner of Interferences decided the interference in favor of the Schneider Company. The decision of the Examiner of Interferences was affirmed by the Assistant Commissioner of Patents on October 28, 1938. Thereafter, counsel for the Schneider Company wrote letters to a number of the Century Company’s customers in Wyoming and Colorado asserting that the *702 Schneider Company owned the mark “Century”; that the Century Company’s use of the word “Century” on whiskey and gin infringed the Schneider Company’s mark, and threatened suit against such customers unless they discontinued selling Century Company’s goods labeled “Century” or “Century Club.”

The Century Company does not now and never has engaged in the manufacture or sale of cereal malt beverages, and the Schneider Company does not now, and never has engaged in the manufacture or sale of distilled alcoholic liquor.

The Century Company brought this suit against the Schneider Company to establish its right to use the mark “Century” on distilled alcoholic beverages and to enjoin the Schneider Company from interfering ' or attempting to interfere with such use. The Schneider Company filed an answer and cross-bill in which it sought to establish its exclusive right to use the mark “Century” on alcoholic beverages, including beer, whiskey, and gin, and to enjoin the Century Company from using the mark “Century” or any colorable variation thereof.

At a pretrial conference a stipulation was entered into which reads in part as follows:

“The first user of the trademark ‘Century’ or ‘Century Club’ for distilled alcoholic liquors was Philip Freiler of Elgin, Illinois, who used ‘Century Club’ on whiskey as early as May 1, 1883, and established it as a well known brand which had a wide distribution primarily in the states of Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Indiana and Michigan. He continued its use on whisky until the year 1914 when the City of Elgin voted dry under local option and he was compelled to discontinue the liquor business there. * * *
“By reason of plaintiff’s wide use and exploitation of the trademarks ‘Century’ and ‘Century Club’ in connection with whisky, gin and alcohol, said trademarks, as applied to such products, are the means by which they are identified and distinguished by the trade and public from whisky, gin and alcohol produced by others; and as to whisky, gin and alcohol, the trademarks ‘Century’ and ‘Century Club’ refer and are understood by the trade and public to refer only to plaintiff’s goods.”

The following is a label used by the Century Company and is typical of the other labels used by that company:

It will be observed that the name and location of the Century Company prominently appear on the label.

The following is a label used by the Schneider Company and is typical of the other labels used by that company:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dovenmuehle v. Gilldorn Mortgage Midwest Corp.
670 F. Supp. 795 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
Discount Muffler Shop, Inc. v. Meineke Realty Corp.
535 F. Supp. 439 (N.D. Ohio, 1982)
Beer Nuts, Inc. v. Clover Club Foods Co.
520 F. Supp. 395 (D. Utah, 1981)
Schnucks Twenty-Five, Inc. v. Bettendorf
595 S.W.2d 279 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
Fotomat Corp. v. Cochran
437 F. Supp. 1231 (D. Kansas, 1977)
Supreme Wine Co. v. American Distilling Co.
203 F. Supp. 736 (S.D. New York, 1962)
Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.
196 F. Supp. 401 (N.D. California, 1961)
Matarazzo v. Isabella
138 F. Supp. 86 (D. Rhode Island, 1956)
Dwight S. Williams Co. v. Lykens Hosiery Mills, Inc.
135 F. Supp. 213 (W.D. North Carolina, 1955)
Future Farmers of America v. Romack
114 F. Supp. 796 (E.D. Illinois, 1953)
Nebraska Consol. Mills Co. v. Shawnee Milling Co.
198 F.2d 36 (Tenth Circuit, 1952)
Speed Products Co., Inc. v. Tinnerman Products, Inc
179 F.2d 778 (Second Circuit, 1949)
Buscaglia v. Tax Court of Puerto Rico
70 P.R. 210 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 F.2d 699, 43 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 262, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ph-schneider-brewing-co-v-century-distilling-co-ca10-1939.