Pfeil v. Jamison

Third Circuit

Pfeil v. Jamison

245 F. 119, 157 C.C.A. 415, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1473

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedOctober 11, 1917

DocketNo. 2238

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 245 F. 119 (Pfeil v. Jamison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pfeil v. Jamison, 245 F. 119, 157 C.C.A. 415, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1473 (3d Cir. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was an action for damages for false imprisonment. The case was heard in the court below on the pleadings alone, and a judgment was entered thereon in favor of the defendant. The questions involved concern the police powers of a large municipality in times of widespread disorder. Without, at present, expressing any opinion whatever on the important and far-reaching questions discussed by counsel, we are of opinion the case could be far more intelligently and wisely disposed of by this court when the evidence has been heard and is before us.

Without, therefore, indicating any view upon the subject, and solely with a view of having the light of the proofs to hereafter aid us, we reverse this judgment, and remand the cause to the court below for the further procedure indicated; the costs in this court to await the further order of this court on the final disposition of the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This was an action for damages for false imprisonment. The case was heard in the court below on the pleadings alone, and a judgment was entered thereon in favor of the defendant. The questions involved concern the police powers of a large municipality in times of widespread disorder. Without, at present, expressing any opinion whatever on the important and far-reaching questions discussed by counsel, we are of opinion the case could be far more intelligently and wisely disposed of by this court when the evidence has been heard and is before us.

Without, therefore, indicating any view upon the subject, and solely with a view of having the light of the proofs to hereafter aid us, we reverse this judgment, and remand the cause to the court below for the further procedure indicated; the costs in this court to await the further order of this court on the final disposition of the cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 F. 119, 157 C.C.A. 415, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfeil-v-jamison-ca3-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack