Pfeifer v. Musiker Student Tours, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pfeifer v. Musiker Student Tours, Inc.

280 A.D.2d 266, 720 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 266 (Pfeifer v. Musiker Student Tours, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pfeifer v. Musiker Student Tours, Inc., 280 A.D.2d 266, 720 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered December 16, 1999, after a nonjury trial, awarding plaintiff damages in the principal amount of $200,000, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the award of damages and direct a new trial on the issue of damages only and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless plaintiff stipulates, within 30 days of service of this order with notice of entry, to reduce the award of damages to the principal amount of $150,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith.

The record, including, in particular, plaintiffs testimony, obviously credited by the trial court as trier of the facts, supports findings that the 15-year-old plaintiff, while on a student tour operated by defendant, was compelled by her counselors, over her protestations, to ride a bicycle even though she got off the bike three times. In view of the compulsion, the defense of assumption of risk does not avail defendant (see, Benitez v New York City Bd. of Educ., 73 NY2d 650, 658; DeGala v Xavier High School, 203 AD2d 187).

Defendant’s motion to file a jury demand nunc pro tunc was properly denied upon evidence showing that defendant was properly served with plaintiffs note of issue demanding a non-jury trial, and that plaintiff waived a jury trial specifically in order to avoid the delay involved in waiting for a jury trial (CPLR 4102 [e]; see, Fidler v Sullivan, 81 AD2d 733, lv dismissed 54 NY2d 601).

The award of $200,000 for plaintiffs injuries, including scars of IV2 centimeters underneath the chin, 3 by IV2 centimeters on the right hip, 3V2 by 3V2 centimeters on the right elbow and similar scars on the knees materially deviates from what is reasonable compensation to the extent indicated (CPLR 5501 [c]; cf., Abdulai v Roy, 232 AD2d 229; Seidner v Unger, 245 AD2d 362). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered December 16, 1999, after a nonjury trial, awarding plaintiff damages in the principal amount of $200,000, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the award of damages and direct a new trial on the issue of damages only and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless plaintiff stipulates, within 30 days of service of this order with notice of entry, to reduce the award of damages to the principal amount of $150,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith.

The record, including, in particular, plaintiffs testimony, obviously credited by the trial court as trier of the facts, supports findings that the 15-year-old plaintiff, while on a student tour operated by defendant, was compelled by her counselors, over her protestations, to ride a bicycle even though she got off the bike three times. In view of the compulsion, the defense of assumption of risk does not avail defendant (see, Benitez v New York City Bd. of Educ., 73 NY2d 650, 658; DeGala v Xavier High School, 203 AD2d 187).

Defendant’s motion to file a jury demand nunc pro tunc was properly denied upon evidence showing that defendant was properly served with plaintiffs note of issue demanding a non-jury trial, and that plaintiff waived a jury trial specifically in order to avoid the delay involved in waiting for a jury trial (CPLR 4102 [e]; see, Fidler v Sullivan, 81 AD2d 733, lv dismissed 54 NY2d 601).

The award of $200,000 for plaintiffs injuries, including scars of IV2 centimeters underneath the chin, 3 by IV2 centimeters on the right hip, 3V2 by 3V2 centimeters on the right elbow and similar scars on the knees materially deviates from what is reasonable compensation to the extent indicated (CPLR 5501 [c]; cf., Abdulai v Roy, 232 AD2d 229; Seidner v Unger, 245 AD2d 362). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 266, 720 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfeifer-v-musiker-student-tours-inc-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack