Abdulai v. Roy

232 A.D.2d 229, 647 N.Y.S.2d 778, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10025
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 10, 1996·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Raymond Cornelius, J.), entered July 12, 1995, which, upon jury verdict, awarded plaintiff $110,000 for past and future pain and suffering, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The jury’s determination that plaintiff suffered a "significant disfigurement” (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]) should not be disturbed. The trial court properly concluded that plaintiff made out a prima facie case that the disfigurement of plaintiffs face was "significant”, i.e., that a reasonable person would view the physical alteration as " 'unattractive, objectionable, or * * * the subject of pity and scorn’ ” (Siegle v County of Fulton, 174 AD2d 930, 931, quoting Caruso v Hall, 101 AD2d 967, 968, affd 64 NY2d 843). Plaintiff’s doctor testified that a line-shaped scar under plaintiff’s right eye was "deeply discolored”, and that a one-third inch scar on his nose was somewhat "thickened”. The doctor stated that the scars had assumed their "permanent or definitive configuration” and concluded that "no treatment * * * could accomplish any significant improvement in the appearance of these two lesions”. Defendants characterize the scars as being only "minor cuts”. However, defendants make no showing that the jury could not have concluded, based on a fair interpretation of the evidence, that the scars are "unattractive” or "objectionable”. Thus, there is no basis to set aside the verdict (supra.).

Finally, the amount of damages does not deviate materially from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abdulai v. Roy, 232 A.D.2d 229, 647 N.Y.S.2d 778, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10025 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

232 A.D.2d 229 (Abdulai v. Roy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Galindo v. Hodminson
2021 NY Slip Op 00115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Feutcher v. Composite Tr.
2019 NY Slip Op 3267 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
O'Brien v. Golan
284 A.D.2d 256 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Pfeifer v. Musiker Student Tours, Inc.
280 A.D.2d 266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Davino v. Jacoby
253 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Colon v. New York City Housing Authority
248 A.D.2d 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Seidner v. Unger
245 A.D.2d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)