Home/Supreme Court/Pfaelzer v. BACH FUR COMPANY

Pfaelzer v. BACH FUR COMPANY

215 U.S. 584, 30 S. Ct. 403, 54 L. Ed. 338, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1766
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 8, 1909
Docket290
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 215 U.S. 584 (Pfaelzer v. BACH FUR COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pfaelzer v. BACH FUR COMPANY, 215 U.S. 584, 30 S. Ct. 403, 54 L. Ed. 338, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1766 (1909).

Opinion

215 U.S. 584 (1909)

PFAELZER
v.
BACH FUR COMPANY.

No. 290.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted November 1, 1909.
Decided November 8, 1909.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Mr. A.S. Gilbert for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Benjamin N. Cardozo for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of final judgment. McLish v. Roff, 141 U.S. 661.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Meyer
272 S.W.2d 249 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1954)
Jerome H. Remick & Company, in Error v. Joseph W. Stern and Edward B. Marks
215 U.S. 585 (Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 U.S. 584, 30 S. Ct. 403, 54 L. Ed. 338, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfaelzer-v-bach-fur-company-scotus-1909.