Jerome H. Remick & Company, in Error v. Joseph W. Stern and Edward B. Marks

215 U.S. 585
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 15, 1909
Docket352
StatusPublished

This text of 215 U.S. 585 (Jerome H. Remick & Company, in Error v. Joseph W. Stern and Edward B. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jerome H. Remick & Company, in Error v. Joseph W. Stern and Edward B. Marks, 215 U.S. 585 (1909).

Opinion

215 U.S. 585

30 S.Ct. 404

54 L.Ed. 338

JEROME H. REMICK & COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
JOSEPH W. STERN and Edward B. Marks.

No. 352.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 15, 1909

Mr. Moses H. Grossman for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Julius Henry Cohen for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: Writ of Error dismissed for want of final judgment. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661, 35 L. ed. 893, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 118; Pfaelzer v. Bach Fur Co., 215 U. S. 584, 54 L. Ed. , 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 403, Nov. 8, 1909.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLish v. Roff
141 U.S. 661 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Pfaelzer v. BACH FUR COMPANY
215 U.S. 584 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Pfaelzer v. Bach Fur Co.
215 U.S. 584 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Jerome H. Remick & Co. v. Stern
215 U.S. 585 (Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 U.S. 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jerome-h-remick-company-in-error-v-joseph-w-stern-and-edward-b-marks-scotus-1909.