Pettus v. Mangano

78 A.D.3d 1057, 910 N.Y.S.2d 917
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pettus v. Mangano. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 A.D.3d 838

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to determine certain motions allegedly made in a case entitled People v Pettus, pending in that court under indictment No. 6013/02, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]).

The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Rivera, J.P., Angiolillo, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pettus v. Mangano, 78 A.D.3d 1057, 910 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

78 A.D.3d 1057 (Pettus v. Mangano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman
422 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)