Pettus v. Mangano

70 A.D.3d 838, 892 N.Y.S.2d 900
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 A.D.3d 838 (Pettus v. Mangano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pettus v. Mangano, 70 A.D.3d 838, 892 N.Y.S.2d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel Guy Mangano, Jr., a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, Charles J. Hynes, the District Attorney, Kings County, and Frank Dudis, an Assistant District Attorney, Kings County, to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate improprieties allegedly committed by the respondents in connection with a criminal proceeding entitled People v Pettus, commenced in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under indictment No. 6013/02, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted [839]*839to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Covello, J.P., Santucci, Miller and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pettus v. District Attorney
76 A.D.2d 1153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 A.D.3d 838, 892 N.Y.S.2d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pettus-v-mangano-nyappdiv-2010.