Pettit v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Fifth Circuit

Pettit v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

175 F.2d 195, 38 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 52, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 4360

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 3, 1949

Docket12583

StatusPublished

Cited by26 cases

This text of 175 F.2d 195 (Pettit v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pettit v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 175 F.2d 195, 38 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 52, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 4360 (5th Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The taxpayers, having in 1931 bought an orange grove in California, and having operated it at a loss (except for one year) sold the land and equipment constituting the business plant in 1942 at a loss of $27,023. The Commissioner allowed $4,-264 of this loss to be carried back to eliminate the net income in 1941, and refunded the tax for 1941. Taxpayers sought in 1943 to carry forward the remaining $22,-759 of the 1942 loss as a deduction in 1943, claiming it to be a “net operating loss” under Internal Revenue Code, Sec. 23(s) and Sec. 122(b) (2), 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 23(s), 122 (b) (2). The Commissioner held that the loss was an ordinary loss that could not be so carried forward, and the Tax Court sustained him. There is room for doubt growing out of intricate provisions of the statute and the history of this and precedent legislation and former regulations; but we think this loss was not one incurred in the operation of a trade or business, and so not an operating loss at all, The business had *196 been abandoned. The, plant was sold not in operating the business, but because the business was not to be operated any more. A deduction to be allowed must always be clearly authorized by law. We follow Lazier v. United States, 8 Cir., 170 F.2d 521, and the

Tudgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The taxpayers, having in 1931 bought an orange grove in California, and having operated it at a loss (except for one year) sold the land and equipment constituting the business plant in 1942 at a loss of $27,023. The Commissioner allowed $4,-264 of this loss to be carried back to eliminate the net income in 1941, and refunded the tax for 1941. Taxpayers sought in 1943 to carry forward the remaining $22,-759 of the 1942 loss as a deduction in 1943, claiming it to be a “net operating loss” under Internal Revenue Code, Sec. 23(s) and Sec. 122(b) (2), 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 23(s), 122 (b) (2). The Commissioner held that the loss was an ordinary loss that could not be so carried forward, and the Tax Court sustained him. There is room for doubt growing out of intricate provisions of the statute and the history of this and precedent legislation and former regulations; but we think this loss was not one incurred in the operation of a trade or business, and so not an operating loss at all, The business had *196 been abandoned. The, plant was sold not in operating the business, but because the business was not to be operated any more. A deduction to be allowed must always be clearly authorized by law. We follow Lazier v. United States, 8 Cir., 170 F.2d 521, and the

Tudgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 F.2d 195, 38 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 52, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 4360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pettit-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca5-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack