Hartwig N. Baruch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

178 F.2d 402
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 28, 1949·No. 21419_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

178 F.2d 402

50-1 USTC P 9117

Hartwig N. BARUCH, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 109, Docket 21419.

United States Court of Appeals
Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 13, 1949.
Decided Dec. 28, 1949.

Irwin C. Rutter, New York City, for Hartwig N. Baruch, petitioner.

Theron Lamar Caudle, and Chas. Oliphant, Assistant Attorneys General, Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott and Sumner M. Redstone, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, for Commissioner of Internal Revenue, respondent.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Lazier v. United States, 8 Cir., 170 F.2d 521, and Pettit v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 175 F.2d 195.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartwig N. Baruch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 178 F.2d 402 (2d Cir. 1949).

178 F.2d 402 (Hartwig N. Baruch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. United States
213 F. Supp. 27 (W.D. Missouri, 1963)