Petrillo v. Petrillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Petrillo v. Petrillo

87 A.D.2d 607, 450 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 607 (Petrillo v. Petrillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petrillo v. Petrillo, 87 A.D.2d 607, 450 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), dated March 26, 1981, as (1) directed appellant to deliver to defendant’s new counsel the file in the action and (2) held that appellant is not entitled to a determination of her fee prior to turnover of the file. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Special Term for a hearing to fix the amount of the outgoing attorney’s lien, if any, and to condition the turnover upon payment of the sum thereby found to be due from defendant to her former attorney or the.posting of security therefor. The hearing shall proceed expeditiously. (See Petrillo v Petrillo, 87 AD2d 607 [No. 16].) Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Niehoff, JJ., concur. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), dated March 26, 1981, as (1) directed appellant to deliver to defendant’s new counsel the file in the action and (2) held that appellant is not entitled to a determination of her fee prior to turnover of the file. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Special Term for a hearing to fix the amount of the outgoing attorney’s lien, if any, and to condition the turnover upon payment of the sum thereby found to be due from defendant to her former attorney or the.posting of security therefor. The hearing shall proceed expeditiously. (See Petrillo v Petrillo, 87 AD2d 607 [No. 16].) Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Niehoff, JJ., concur. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 607, 450 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrillo-v-petrillo-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack