Petrillo v. Bates

56 A.D.2d 577, 391 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10616
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 56 A.D.2d 577 (Petrillo v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Petrillo v. Bates, 56 A.D.2d 577, 391 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in which petitioner, inter alia, seeks reinstatement to her position as an intermediate clerk, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 19, 1976, which, inter alia, (1) directed her reinstatement and (2) directed appellants to conduct a due process hearing. Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting the second and fourth decretal

[578]*578paragraphs thereof. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Provisional employees who are granted pretermination hearings are not entitled to reinstatement and back pay pending the hearing (see Matter of Cohen v Department of Mental Hygiene of State of N. Y., 48 AD2d 697; Matter of Perry v Blair, 49 AD2d 309; Matter of Reeves v Golar, 45 AD2d 163). A provisional employee is entitled to a pretermination hearing upon proof of (1) stigmatization (see Matter of Reeves v Golar, supra; Matter of Civil Serv. Employees Assn, v Wallach, 48 AD2d 923; Matter of Jackson v Wallach, 48 AD2d 925; Matter of Perry v Blair, supra) and (2) loss of present job (cf. Paul v Davis, 424 US 693). Where the discharge is not related to job performance, proof of publication to the prospective employer is unnecessary (cf. Bishop v Wood, 426 US 341). The charge upon which petitioner claims she was discharged is a crime and this constitutes stigmatizing behavior entitling her to a hearing. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Briggins v. McGuire
118 Misc. 2d 964 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Stanziale v. Executive Department of Office of General Services
77 A.D.2d 600 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Hill v. Edelman
92 Misc. 2d 485 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.D.2d 577, 391 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petrillo-v-bates-nyappdiv-1977.