Cohen v. Department of Mental Hygiene

48 A.D.2d 697, 368 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9744
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 27, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 48 A.D.2d 697 (Cohen v. Department of Mental Hygiene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. Department of Mental Hygiene, 48 A.D.2d 697, 368 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the dismissal of petitioner from his position of Provisional Teacher II at the Willowbrook State School, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 26, 1974, which granted the petition and directed appellants to reinstate petitioner to his position and to pay him his salary from the date of the dismissal, less any compensation received from other employment. Judgment modified, on the law, by striking therefrom the first two decretal paragraphs, which state that the petition is granted and direct appellants to reinstate petitioner. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs, and matter remanded to appellants for a hearing consistent with the views herein set forth. Petitioner was a provisional employee who was not entitled to a hearing and could have been dismissed without reason. His dismissal was grounded not upon dissatisfaction with his services, but upon a finding of unjustified physical abuse of a resident patient. The finding was made in the absence of a hearing. Where a person’s good name or reputation is at stake because of what the State or one of its agencies has done with respect to him, due process would accord him an opportunity to refute the charge (Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564). Accordingly, the matter should be remanded to appellants for a hearing consonant with due process require[698]*698ments. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lyles v. Ravitch
101 A.D.2d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Stanziale v. Executive Department of Office of General Services
77 A.D.2d 600 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Chant v. Department of State
60 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Hill v. Edelman
92 Misc. 2d 485 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
Association of Surrogate's & Supreme Court Reporters v. City of New York
57 A.D.2d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Petrillo v. Bates
56 A.D.2d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
McShane v. City Civil Service Commission
51 A.D.2d 521 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A.D.2d 697, 368 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-department-of-mental-hygiene-nyappdiv-1975.