Peterson v. Wheelus

194 So. 2d 627
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 1967
DocketNo. 724
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 194 So. 2d 627 (Peterson v. Wheelus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peterson v. Wheelus, 194 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Peterson and Norma Peterson, his wife, defendants, appeal a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in an action for gross negligence brought against them by Ruby Wheelus and Crowell Wheelus, her husband, plaintiffs.

The sole question presented on appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict finding the defendants grossly negligent. Where the line separating simple and gross negligence is indistinct, the proper course is to leave the question to be decided by the jury. Foy v. Fleming, Fla.App.1964, 168 So.2d 177. A careful consideration of the record on appeal and the briefs of counsel reveals conflicts in the testimony. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict finding defendants grossly negligent.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, Acting C. J., CROSS, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Black v. Zaretsky
209 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. MacMillan
194 So. 2d 627 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 2d 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-wheelus-fladistctapp-1967.