Peterson v. Wheelus
This text of 194 So. 2d 627 (Peterson v. Wheelus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dennis Peterson and Norma Peterson, his wife, defendants, appeal a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in an action for gross negligence brought against them by Ruby Wheelus and Crowell Wheelus, her husband, plaintiffs.
The sole question presented on appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict finding the defendants grossly negligent. Where the line separating simple and gross negligence is indistinct, the proper course is to leave the question to be decided by the jury. Foy v. Fleming, Fla.App.1964, 168 So.2d 177. A careful consideration of the record on appeal and the briefs of counsel reveals conflicts in the testimony. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict finding defendants grossly negligent.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 So. 2d 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-wheelus-fladistctapp-1967.