Home/Supreme Court/Peterson v. Wainwright

Peterson v. Wainwright

374 U.S. 108, 83 S. Ct. 1689, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1028, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1286
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 10, 1963
Docket754, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 374 U.S. 108 (Peterson v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peterson v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 108, 83 S. Ct. 1689, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1028, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1286 (1963).

Opinion

374 U.S. 108 (1963)

PETERSON
v.
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.

No. 754, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 10, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida for a hearing on the issue of whether petitioner was denied the assistance of counsel at the time he entered his plea of guilty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. State
157 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Peterson v. Wainwright
155 So. 2d 542 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 U.S. 108, 83 S. Ct. 1689, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1028, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-wainwright-scotus-1963.