Peterson v. State

731 So. 2d 821, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5524, 1999 WL 253145
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peterson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 775 So. 2d 376
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 1999·No. No. 98-02179·Published

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

Gary W. Peterson appeals his convictions on the charges of leaving the scene of an accident with death and driving while license suspended. Because he did not preserve for appeal any legally dispositive issue, we affirm.

The only issue presented by Peterson— a challenge to the trial court’s order that he pay restitution — is not properly before this court. Although orally pronounced, the order to pay restitution was not reduced to writing. See Walker v. State, 647 So.2d 262 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to Peterson timely seeking appellate review of the restitution issue subsequent to the rendition of a restitution order.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. State, 731 So. 2d 821, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5524, 1999 WL 253145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

731 So. 2d 821 (Peterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. State
647 So. 2d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)