Peterson v. State

680 So. 2d 581, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9340, 1996 WL 496378
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 4, 1996·No. No. 95-02025·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Peggy Ann Peterson appeals her conviction and sentence. We strike the payment provision of probation condition 8 because it is a special condition of probation that was not announced at sentencing. See, e.g., State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996); Justice v. State, 674 So.2d 123 (Fla.1996). In all other respects, we affirm.

THREADGILL, C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. State, 680 So. 2d 581, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9340, 1996 WL 496378 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

680 So. 2d 581 (Peterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hampton v. State
680 So. 2d 581 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)