Peterson v. State

651 So. 2d 248, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2300, 1995 WL 94398
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peterson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 645 So. 2d 1028
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 1995·No. No. 94-1438·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order revoking the probation of Steven Wayne Peterson. The parties agree that the order of revocation erroneously indicates that Peterson violated two conditions of his probation; whereas at the revocation hearing, the trial judge based the revocation only on the first violation alleged.

The order revoking appellant’s probation is affirmed. The cause is remanded with directions to enter a written order of revocation conforming to the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the revocation hearing. See Maddox v. State, 619 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

WEBSTER, MICKLE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. State, 651 So. 2d 248, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2300, 1995 WL 94398 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

651 So. 2d 248 (Peterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddox v. State
619 So. 2d 473 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)