Peterson v. Peterson

244 N.W. 320, 60 S.D. 264
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peterson v. Peterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 S.D. 399
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided September 27, 1932·No. File No. 7398·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a former appeal in this case an opinion was rendered (56 S. D. 399, 228 N. W. 804, 805) whereby the cause was “remanded with directions to the trial court to enter judgment in conformity to this- opinion.” A subsequent judgment was entered by the trial court, and this is an attempted appeal from that judgment.

[265]*265We refrain from in any way passing" upon the question of whether an appeal is the proper procedure to present the questions involved to this court. However, from the record as made, it is so apparent to us that the subsequent decree of the trial judge is in conformity to the mandate of this court in its former opinion that without further discussion the judgment as now entered is affirmed.

CAMPBELL, P. J., and HOLLEY, ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. Peterson, 244 N.W. 320, 60 S.D. 264 (S.D. 1932).

244 N.W. 320 (Peterson v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peterson v. Peterson
228 N.W. 804 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1930)