Peterson v. Patrick
126 Mass. 395, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 273
This text of 126 Mass. 395 (Peterson v. Patrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peterson v. Patrick, 126 Mass. 395, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 273 (Mass. 1879).
Opinion
The verdict is ambiguous, because it does not show whether the jury determined that the value of the piano should not be deducted from the amount of the note, or made no decision at all upon that question. The court below erred in ordering a verdict in so irregular and indefinite a form to be recorded.
Exceptions sustained, and verdict set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
James Turner & Sons v. Great Northern Railway Co.
272 N.W. 489 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1937)
Stetson v. Stindt
279 F. 209 (Third Circuit, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
126 Mass. 395, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-patrick-mass-1879.