Peterson v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peterson v. Hill

248 A.D. 591

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 591 (Peterson v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. Hill, 248 A.D. 591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of peremptory mandamus reversed on the law and not in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and petition dismissed, without costs, on authority of Matter of Budd v. Hill (ante, p. 590), decided herewith. The appeal, in so far as it purports to bring up for review the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict and the motion for a new trial is dismissed. There is no such order in the record. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of peremptory mandamus reversed on the law and not in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and petition dismissed, without costs, on authority of Matter of Budd v. Hill (ante, p. 590), decided herewith. The appeal, in so far as it purports to bring up for review the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict and the motion for a new trial is dismissed. There is no such order in the record. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-hill-nyappdiv-1936.