Peterson v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peterson v. Hill

243 A.D. 738

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 738 (Peterson v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. Hill, 243 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Peremptory order of mandamus reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to Special Term to proceed as directed under the authority of Matter of Budd v. Hill (ante, p. 735), decided herewith. Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., votes for reversal and denial of the motion for the reasons stated in his dissenting memorandum (ante, p. 735) decided herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peremptory order of mandamus reversed on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to Special Term to proceed as directed under the authority of Matter of Budd v. Hill (ante, p. 735), decided herewith. Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., votes for reversal and denial of the motion for the reasons stated in his dissenting memorandum (ante, p. 735) decided herewith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-hill-nyappdiv-1935.