Peterson v. Commissioner

1965 T.C. Memo. 151, 24 T.C.M. 798, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 180
United States Tax Court·Decided June 1, 1965·No. Docket No. 2247-63.·Unpublished

Opinion

Donald J. Peterson and Ruth M. Peterson v. Commissioner.
Peterson v. Commissioner
Docket No. 2247-63.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1965-151; 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 180; 24 T.C.M. (CCH) 798; T.C.M. (RIA) 65151;
June 1, 1965
*180 Dale Forbes and Melvyn M. Ryan, for the petitioners. H. Kent Holman, for the respondent.

FAY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

FAY, Judge: The Commissioner determined deficiencies in petitioners' income taxes as follows:

Taxable
PetitionerYearAmount
Donald J. Peterson 11957$1,861.94
Donald J. Peterson and Ruth
M. Peterson19581,623.25
Donald J. Peterson and Ruth
M. Peterson1959959.10

The issue for decision is whether distributions received by petitioners during the years in issue with respect to instruments issued by certain cemetery corporations and designated "Certificates of Indebtedness" constitute distributions received upon the exchange for the partial redemption or retirement of said certificates, thereby rendering the gains taxable at capital gain rates pursuant to section 1232 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 2 or constitute dividend income taxable as ordinary income. The other issue*181 raised by the pleadings has been settled by the parties and will be given effect to under the Rule 50 computation.

Findings of Fact

Some of the facts have been stipulated, and the stipulation of facts, together with the exhibits attached thereto, is incorporated herein by this reference.

Petitioners Donald J. Peterson (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Peterson) and Ruth M. Peterson (sometimes hereinafter referred to as Ruth) are husband and wife residing in Portland, Oregon. The income tax returns for the years in issue were filed with the district director of internal revenue, Helena, Montana. The return for 1957 was the separate return of Peterson, while the returns for 1958 and 1959 were joint returns of Peterson and Ruth.

Peterson became associated with the cemetery business in 1952, starting as a salesman. He was employed by Sunset Memorial Gardens of Billings, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Billings), a corporation whose principal place of business was in Billings, Montana. He was employed by Billings until 1958 when he left for Kalispell, Montana, and became associated*182 with Glacier Memorial Gardens of Kalispell, Inc., another cemetery corporation, operating in Kalispell, in which corporation Peterson served as salesman.

During his tour of duty with Billings, Peterson rose to the position of vice-president and sales manager. In his capacity of sales manager he supervised salesmen connected with the following Montana cemetery corporations: Sunset Memorial Gardens of Lewistown, Inc., Sunset Memorial Gardens of Sidney, Inc., Sunset Memorial Gardens of Harve, Inc., and Sunset Memorial Gardens of Shelby, Inc.; also Sunset Memorial Gardens of Bend, Inc., located in Bend, Oregon. Hereinafter each cemetery corporation will be referred to by the city wherein it is located.

The following is a list of the corporations involved herein, showing the date of incorporation and the shares of stock owned by Peterson:

Shares
Date ofOwned by
CorporationIncorporationPeterson 1
BillingsNovember 3, 19521
SidneyJuly 22, 1955None
LewistownJune 17, 195550
HavreJanuary 21, 1955None

The business of each of the corporations*183 referred to in the above schedule was to acquire and operate land to be used exclusively for a cemetery for the burial of the dead and to conduct activities necessary and incidental to the operation of such cemetery. Since their organization the corporations have been engaged in the business of operating memorial-type cemeteries and a part of such business has included the sale to the public of burial rights in lots and plots located therein.

During his employment at Billings, Peterson, together with Edwin Rath (hereinafter referred to as Rath), the president of Billings, purchased various pieces of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peterson v. Commissioner, 1965 T.C. Memo. 151, 24 T.C.M. 798, 1965 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 180 (tax 1965).

1965 T.C. Memo. 151 (Peterson v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related