GARDENS OF FAITH, INC., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

345 F.2d 180, 15 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 646, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6178
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 1965
Docket9714, 9715
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 345 F.2d 180 (GARDENS OF FAITH, INC., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GARDENS OF FAITH, INC., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, 345 F.2d 180, 15 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 646, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6178 (4th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Raymond F. Cushing and wife were instrumental in organizing two cemetery corporations, Gardens of Faith, Inc., and Evergreen Memorial Gardens, Inc. The corporations issued certain “Certificates of Indebtedness” for undetermined amounts, which required them to pay to the certificate holders 25% of the base sales price of every burial lot sold by the corporations for 50 years.

The issues in this appeal are the appropriate tax treatment of the sums thus paid, both in the corporations’ returns and those of the certificate holders, Cush *181 ing and wife. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue contends that the certificate holders are equity investors in the respective corporations and therefore the corporations are not entitled to deduct as land costs the payments máde to the certificate holders, and that amounts received by the individual taxpayers with respect to the “Certificates of Indebtedness” are, to the extent of the corporate earnings and profits, taxable as dividends. The court upheld the Commissioner’s contentions. 1964 P-H T. C. Memo, Dec., Par. 64, 178.

The opposing arguments addressed to us by the taxpayers in their brief and oral presentation are fairly stated and convincingly answered in the exhaustive opinion of the Tax Court. This case presents a mixed question of law and fact. The correct legal principle was followed and the resolution of the factual issue by the Tax Court was warranted.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McManus v. Commissioner
1981 T.C. Memo. 196 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
Rose Hills Memorial Park Ass'n v. United States
463 F.2d 425 (Court of Claims, 1972)
Knollwood Memorial Gardens v. Commissioner
46 T.C. 764 (U.S. Tax Court, 1966)
Peterson v. Commissioner
1965 T.C. Memo. 151 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)
Roe v. Commissioner
1965 T.C. Memo. 100 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 F.2d 180, 15 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 646, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardens-of-faith-inc-petitioner-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca4-1965.