Peterson v. Ball

California Supreme Court

Peterson v. Ball

211 Cal. 779

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 1931

DocketL. A. No. 10958

StatusPublished

This text of 211 Cal. 779 (Peterson v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. Ball, 211 Cal. 779 (Cal. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

In this action the same questions are presented as were before the court in the case of Fred E. Peterson v. W. F. Ball (L. A. No. 10957), ante, p. 461 [296 Pac. 291], this day decided. The parties are practically the same in each action and the only difference in the two relates to the amount of the indebtedness claimed to have been illegally incurred. The same procedure was had in this action as was taken in the prior action, L. A. No. 10957, and resulted in a judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants herein. On the authority of the prior action, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

In this action the same questions are presented as were before the court in the case of Fred E. Peterson v. W. F. Ball (L. A. No. 10957), ante, p. 461 [296 Pac. 291], this day decided. The parties are practically the same in each action and the only difference in the two relates to the amount of the indebtedness claimed to have been illegally incurred. The same procedure was had in this action as was taken in the prior action, L. A. No. 10957, and resulted in a judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants herein. On the authority of the prior action, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 Cal. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-ball-cal-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack